Why is customer experience vital for long term sustainability?

Post image for Why is customer experience vital for long term sustainability?

by Jed on July 26, 2010

Sustainability is a buzz word at the moment, whether it be due to a realisation that we cannot go on treating the world the way we have, without depleting its natural resources, or because businesses are engaging in a fight for survival for customers who crave cheaper, better and faster services and now also with a personal touch. Sustainability has been defined as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. Put simply sustainability is the “ability” to “sustain”, to keep going, to not deplete the resources we rely on. For sustainable organisations this means balancing the needs of the organisation against the environment, the balance sheet and society (or the environmental, economic and social factors as depicted in the graphic below [Source: Wikipedia]):

The triple bottom line of sustainability – balancing social, environmental and economic factors

The triple bottom line of sustainability – balancing social, environmental and economic factors

At the risk of sounding like jumping on a bandwagon, this two part post will examine the reasons why sustainability is becoming an extremely important part of the customer experience and vice-versa why customer experience is vital for the long term business sustainability of many organisations. The first part of this two part post will look at the latter.

Harnessing customer experience for long term business sustainability

If sustainability is all about ensuring the long term availability of an organisation’s vital resources to ensure long term survival, then the number one priority of all organisations is to retain the most vital resource of all: the customer. This means finding a competitive advantage, however, options for finding a competitive advantage may be few and far between.

Customers are fussy. We are inundated with choice and hold more power over brands and services than ever before. Faster, better and cheaper can still be sources of competitive advantage, but the ability to sustain these long term will require big investments in research and development and talent. Those companies that have bright enough talent, ideas and money to invest may still be able to compete on these fronts, but other companies can do far worse than to win the hearts and minds of their customers through delivering a personal and engaging customer experience. A well executed customer experience consistent time after time, visit after visit will win trust and ensure a service stays in the heart of their customers for a long time.

Therefore for most organisations, defining and delivering an excellent customer experience is the most vital aspect to ensuring long term sustainability. Taking care of environmental and economic factors are irrelevant if the economics of a business isn’t taken care of and the organisation isn’t generating enough revenue from its customers. This means that driving repeat custom should be at the forefront of an organisations strategy, and what better way in this word of mouth age than providing a customer experience people want to build a tribe around?

Slowly but surely organisations that don’t meet customer’s expectations consistently will become extinct. Products can be duplicated and the race to the bottom in terms of pricing is being drawn out and is no longer a sensible business strategy. Existing multinationals or businesses that operate at the peak of innovation or who can find drastically new ways to decrease their pricing models may be able to compete on these fronts, but the majority of companies cannot. Mass marketing is also proving to be remarkably ineffective in the modern business age. Connecting and engaging with customers on an emotional level is emerging as the best source of a competitive advantage, because building a customer excellence focussed culture and work force is extremely difficult to replicate. Therefore, those that manage it will, and are, reaping the rewards.

Furthermore, because of the explosion of different media channels, to ensure sustainability this customer centric philosophy must be employed across all touchpoints. There has been a lot of debate recently about whether customer service is the new marketing. This is a wasted conversation in my eyes since customer service and marketing both represent elements of the wider customer experience. They work together, should complement each other and be consistent across all elements of a service or brand over time. Inconsistent messages or levels of customer centricity will be found out by the customer and they will turn elsewhere, as explained in this excellent article by Tim Sanchez which really highlights the importance of consistency in a service delivery. This is also a topic I talked about in this post (Twitter article) a couple of months ago.

What factors do you think influence the long term economic sustainability of an organisation? I would love to hear any thoughts you have.

Remember the Triple Bottom Line graphic at the top of this article? This post examined why customer experience is important for the long term economic sustainability of an organisation. The next part of this two-part post will examine why environmental and social sustainability are becoming increasingly more important elements of the customer experience.

  • Ellen O'neal

    Thanks, Jed – Good post. I think you've hit the nail on the head here. Customers have an array of choices, and if they don't get what they want with you, they'll go somewhere else. A company must have customers, or preferably keep their current customers, to stay in business – obviously, right? But how can you manage the customer's experience if you don't know that they're unhappy? You'll certainly know they were unhappy once you lost their business, but wouldn't you like to know that before they go to your competitor? How do you know what they want if they don't ask?

    This is actually the topic of a blog I recently read: http://info.livelogic.net/customer-intelligence…. Warning, this is my company's blog, a blog I also write for. Needless to say, I think it's a solid concern all businesses should have and address.

    I look forward to second part of your post. Thanks for writing!

    Ellen O'Neal
    http://www.livelogic.net

  • http://www.robertpickstone.com Robert Pickstone

    If keeping customers and maintaining a competitive advantage are the main factors in becoming sustainable, then I would consider adaptability to be key trait of successful businesses in the future. In my mind, there are 3 very important areas that companies will need to consistently adapt to – environmental, cultural and technological. Legislation will force firms to operate with the environment in mind, customers will change moving forward based on how culture develops, and there will be new methods of operating based on how technology develops. If a company can stay on the pulse in these three areas, then they can continue to provide customers with the experiences they desire, and sustainability is a realistic goal. If not, then they are leaving themselves wide open.

    Without adaptability, sustainability is not an option.

  • http://www.jedlangdon.com/ Jed Langdon

    Excellent comment Rob. I agree that adaptability is definitely a key trait to successful businesses of the future and particularly sustainable businesses. In terms of economic sustainability, being adaptable allows companies to recreate themselves when customers expectations, wants and needs change.

    My next post will focus on the other two pillars of sustainability – the environment and society – and I believe adaptability becomes even more important when looking at these. Adaptable companies will be able to lead the movements towards sustainability in these areas and set the example for others to follow, as well as being able to adapt to external forces as you have said.

    I believe that adaptability is a culture or a mindset; it is a willingness to embrace change. Companies that accept that change happens and are willing to embrace it find ways to reform their operations around it. However those that see change as “fads” that will go away, tend to get washed away with the tide. What do you see as the key traits of an adaptable company?

  • http://www.jedlangdon.com/ Jed Langdon

    Hi Ellen, thanks for visiting my blog and for your great comment. I agree that it is extremely difficult for a company to manage the customer experience if they don’t know that a customer is unhappy.

    I am a firm believer of getting feedback from frontline staff, as I blogged about a couple of months ago [http://jedlangdon.com/?p=87]. This is a great way of finding out if there are elements of your service customers are unhappy with. One of the benefits for face-to-face service organisations is that there is an existing dialogue with the customer and therefore those on the frontline have an opportunity to get feedback on each and every transaction. Part of the customer experience process for these service organisations it to recruit staff that believe in your service, train them well and give them easy communication channels to because engaged staff will be more than willing to offer this feedback back to you. For non face to face services getting feedback on a service is a lot more difficult, as it is tougher for customers to communicate feedback back to you, especially at the point of consumption.

    Thanks for pointing me in the direction of your company’s blog, there are some great resources there. Have added to my RSS feed and look forward to reading some of your articles there.

    Cheers,
    Jed

  • http://twitter.com/bsdalton Barry Dalton

    Jed,
    there are many angles to the sustainability issue as you pointed out. The critical point for me is that they dont have to be in conflict and, in harmony, actually drive bottom line performance.

    A very topical example – BP:
    It is becoming evident that they have had pretty low regard, institutionally, for environmental sustainability from what we're learning of their safety practices. This led to Deep Water Horizon. This will impact customer perception of the company and cause customers to defect as this accident negatively impacts their experience with the brand (boycotts and all are admirable but a bit hypocritical unless of course you ride a bicycle or walk everywhere, but thats another discussion). This loss of sustained/repeat customers and the lack of concern for environmental sustainability led to a $17b quarterly loss announced yesterday, destroying a huge chunk of value which may, in the end, lead to BP not sustaining itself as an on-going concern.

    Ok, a kind of off center example. But, the point is. Its all connected. Your graphic depicts that well. In thinking about the equation and the variables, might it also be valuable to look at them with respect to their dependency on each other. In you graphic, a venn diagram shows the economic, environmental and social as having equal impact on the business. I think the ultimate motivator for a business concern is profitability (not a dirty word), and without a sustainable economic model, the other elements, as well as the business itself cease to be relevant. So, another way to look at these elements is in a pyramid with the economic elements as the foundational base, supported by sound business practices in the other areas.

    thoughts?

    Finally, couple clarification questions:
    1. I don't actually see the customer represented in your venn diagram. Is that intentional or is the customer relevant in the diagram?
    2. can you explain “bearable” and “equitable”? Or are those left for your next installment. Seems to me an organization that doesn't have a sound economic model isn't bearable, its extinct.

    thanks in advance. Look forward to the next installment
    Barry

  • http://www.jedlangdon.com/ Jed Langdon

    Thanks for your input Barry.

    First of all, thank you for the excellent BP example you provided, which isn't off center at all! I was actually thinking about this crisis when I began getting my thoughts together for the next post I am writing, so I hope you don't mind me quoting you!

    Secondly, you have actually exposed a big mistake in my post, in that I haven't accredited the graphic, which is in fact the handiwork of Johann Dréo (via Wikipedia). It is based on the “three pillars” of sustainability (social, economic and environmental) which was born from the 2005 World Summit. Apologies for the confusion, this wasn't a deliberate attempt to mislead, I purely forgot to go back and accredit the image, which I have now fixed!

    Your comment has however, got me thinking about whether a better diagram could be created that depicts the interdependent relationship of these aspects of sustainability on the customer and on the customer experience. I completely agree with you that profitability is the most important aspect for a business, which really is the focus of this post i.e. ensuring economic sustainability. In my next post I am going to look at how environmental and social sustainability affect the customer experience and therefore profits…and from there I would like to put into perspective where the customer fits into this diagram. I don't want to give too much away before the post, so would love to continue this conversation once my next post is up…!

    Thanks again for getting the cogs whirring!
    Jed

  • http://jedlangdon.com/?p=218 Part 2: The impact of sustainability on customer experience

    [...] great comment after my previous post by Barry Dalton gives us another high profile example of where poor environmental performance has [...]

  • http://www.logallot.com Sonia

    The one company that comes to mind to me when you say “personal experience” is Apple. They “get”that customers want something they can truly customize and make their own. When I buy something, that’s the first thing I look for: can I change the colors, background etc. As corny as it sounds, “corny works”. Electronics are getting smaller and not bulky looking like they use to be. Remember how big cell phones use to be? I sure don’t want to carry around a “block of cheese” anymore (LOL). 

    Sustainability is huge if you’re company knows how to “tap” into that, but it’s “what” they say that will result in if your company is around for the next 20yrs. You can have the best product out there, but if it doesn’t hit home with consumers or appeal to them like the iPad, it won’t have a huge effect.  

    Your brand has to keep evolving and keep up with the latest technology trends. It might sound like everyone is copying each other, but in a sense we are, just on a different level.  Apple has set the “bar” on innovation and the market sits and waits to see what else they can conjour up. That’s POWER!

  • http://www.jedlangdon.com/ Jed Langdon

    Thanks for the awesome comment Sonia!

    I completely agree with you. When I think about customer experience Apple is also one of the first brands I think of. They really have understood and nailed that experience is about how you make your customers ‘feel’. Buying Apple products makes you feel good, from the moment you are greeted at their stores or log onto their website, to the moment you pick up the product and are able to start using it with ease. Their consistent attention to detail on all the touchpoints that customers come into contact with them is phenomenal and sets the customer experience benchmark incredibly high for their competitors. It is difficult to out-innovate them, out-market them, or make customers feel more valued than they do!

    That is a fantastic quote as well, I will definitely remember it!

Previous post:

Next post: